IRS Warns of Scams When Donating After Disasters The IRS has reminded taxpayers that while donating to disaster relief is a compassionate and impactful way to help, it is equally important to remain cautious. In the aftermath of disasters, scam acti...
IRS Highlights Retirement Benefits of IRAs The IRS has reminded taxpayers that Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) continue to provide important benefits for those planning their financial future. A traditional IRA allows earnings to grow ta...
KY - Standard deduction for 2026 tax year announced Kentucky announced the personal income tax standard deduction for the 2026 tax year. The deduction is increasing by $90 from $3,270 for the 2025 tax year to $3,360. Press Release, Kentucky Department...
How long are you required to keep tax returns and supporting documents according to the IRS?
Record Retention for Tax Returns and Supporting Documents
According to the IRS Publication 583, you should retain any records that support an income item or deduction on a tax return until the time when the return can no longer be amended to claim a credit or refund or the IRS can assess additional tax.
Period of Limitations
IF you...
THEN the period of retention (# of years after the return is filed) is...
1. Owe additional tax and situations (2), (3), and (4), below, do not apply to you
3 years
2. Do not report income that you should report and it is more than 25% of the gross income shown on the return
6 years
3. File a fraudulent return
Keep indefinitely
4. Do not file a return
Keep indefinitely
5. File a claim for credit or refund after you filed your return
Later of: 3 years or 2 years after tax was paid
6. File a claim for a loss from worthless securities or a bad debt deduction
7 years
7.Employment tax records
4 years after tax is due or paid (whichever is later)
Above Table from IRS Publication 583 (1/2007), Starting a Business and Keeping Records & IRS Publication 552 (4/2005), Recordkeeping for Individuals
Before discarding any documents, ask yourself these questions.
1.Is this document connected to an asset?If the document does relate to property that you still have, you should keep the document for depreciation, amortization, or depletion deduction purposes as well as aiding you in figuring gain or loss on the sale or disposition of the property.If you no longer have the asset, you should keep the records for that asset until the period of limitations expires for the year in which you disposed of the asset.
2.Is this document needed for other non-tax purposes?You may be required by a creditor or insurance company to retain a document long after the IRS retention period.
Includes Standard Deductions, Personal Exemptions and Mileage Rates
Individual Capital Gains Rate
Individual capital gains rate can vary from 5% to 28% depending upon the type of capital gain property sold, the holding period, the date acquired and the regular tax bracket the taxpayer falls within.Certain dividend income is also taxed at capital gains rates.See your tax consultant.
Standard Deductions
Single
$5,000
Joint Filers
$10,000
Joint, Filing Separately
$5,000
Heads of Households
$7,300
Personal Exemptions
Exemption Amount- $3,200
The exemption amount is reduced by approximately 2% for each $2,500 by which the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income exceeds:
Single taxpayers
$145,950
Married filing jointly and qualified widows and widowers
Includes information on Corporate Rates, MACRS Percentages, Estate and Trust Income Rates, FICA, Benefit Limitations, and Social Security Retirement Wage Limits.
Corporate Federal Tax Rates
Corporate Federal Tax Rates 2005 - 2008
Taxable Income
Tax
% on Excess
0
0
15%
50,000
7,500
25%
75,000
13,750
34%
100,000
22,250
39%
335,000
113,900
34%
10,000,000
3,400,000
35%
15,000,000
5,150,000
38%
18,333,333
6,416,667
35%
MACRS Percentages
(with half year convention)
Year
5-year Property
7-year Property
1
20.00%
14.29%
2
32.00%
24.49%
3
19.20%
17.49%
4
11.52%
12.49%
5
11.52%
8.93%
6
5.76%
8.92%
7
--
8.93%
8
--
4.46%
FICA
Year
Maximum Salary
Rate
2008
Social Security
$102,000
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
2007
Social Security
$97,500
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
2006
Social Security
$94,200
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
2005
Social Security
$90,000
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
Self-employed individuals pay both the employee and employer portion
but get a deduction for the employer portion.
In 2008, total wages paid to household employees of at least $1,600 are subject to FICA taxes.
In 2007, total wages paid to household employees of at least $1,500 are subject to FICA taxes.
Benefits Limitations
Year
401(k) Contribution Limit (Below Aged 50)
401(k)
Contribution Limit (Age 50 or Higher)
Defined Contribution Plan Limit
Compensation Limit for Calculating Plan Contributions
Defined Benefit Plan Limit
2008
$ 15,500
$ 20,500
$ 46,000
$ 230,000
$ 185,000
2007
$ 15,500
$ 20,500
$ 45,000
$ 225,000
$ 180,000
2006
$ 15,000
$ 20,000
$ 44,000
$ 220,000
$ 175,000
2005
$ 14,000
$ 18,000
$ 42,000
$ 210,000
$ 170,000
Social Security Earnings Limit for 2008
When You Reach Full Retirement Age (FRA)
Amount You Can Earn
If Your Earnings Exceed The Limit
If you are under FRA for all of 2008
$13,560
$1 of benefits is withheld for every $2 you earn above $13,560.
If you attain FRA in 2008
$36,120 before the month in which you attain FRA
$1 of benefits is withheld for every $3 you earn above $36,120.
Let's Take a Look at Social Security
Presented to The Conversation
May 26, 2005
by DeWitt T. Hisle
What Would FDR Think?
by DeWitt T. Hisle
Presented to The Conversation on May 26, 2005
In 1935, 70 years ago, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act.Monthly payments began in 1940.He said:
“We have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against a poverty ridden old age.”
Social Security
Social Security is often described as the most popular government program, and Americans collectively have come to rely on it for their retirement years.But the long-term viability of Social Security must be addressed in the very near future.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants strongly urges that, before taking a position on a possible solution to the funding shortfall, policymakers and the public need to gain a clear understanding of the issues involved in reforming Social Security.The goal of my discussion is to provide some facts and analysis.
Social Security is Not Broke
Social Security Administrations best guess assumptions:
·The Trust Fund surplus will peak in 2028.
·It will decline steadily until 2042 at which time it will be exhausted.
·Inadequate funds do not mean zero benefits:
·Full benefits through 2042.
·Thereafter scheduled benefits would have to be reduced by 27%.
·In 2078 benefits would be reduced by 32%.
Although best guess assumptions are reasonable there is uncertainty about actual results.
·High cost assumptions Trust Fund peaks in 2021 completely depleted by 2031.
·Low cost assumptions Trust Fund would not be depleted and there is no long term problem.
Some Solutions
This Social Security “deficit” could be funded by:
·An immediate infusion of $3.54 trillion.
·By increasing the payroll tax from its current level of 12.4% to 14.3%.
·Reducing current scheduled benefits by 12.6%.
·Improving the rate of return on investments.
·Raise the cap on income subject to the tax.
QUESTIONS FOR EVALUATING PERSONAL ACCOUNT PROPOSALS
Among the most important issues to consider under any personal account proposal are the following:
·To what degree, and over what period, would benefits under the existing system remain in place?
·Will there be a safety net for low-income beneficiaries?
·How much choice will individuals have about:
oParticipating?
oInvestments?
oDistributions?
·Will benefit payments be subject to tax?If so, at what rate?
·What will the plan “cost” beneficiaries in lost traditional benefits as a trade-off for a personal account?
·Should the private accounts be in addition to the basic guaranteed benefits?
AT THE MERCY OF EVENTS
Say you retired in March of 2000 with $100,000 in your private account in an Index Fund.Your inflation-adjusted annuity would be about $680 a month.
If you retired in October 2002 with the same number of shares of the Index Fund it would be worth $60,000.Your annuity would be about $279 a month.
Saved the same – retired at different times – at the mercy of events.
We don’t save for retirement
Workers' savings
Percentage of workers by amounts
saved for retirement:
Less than $25,000
52%
52% < 25,000
$25,000-$49,000
13%
65% < 50,000
$50,000-$99,000
13%
78% < 100,000
$100,000-$249,000
12%
90% < 250,000
$250,000 or more
11%
Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute
Note:Does not add up to 100 because of rounding
Social Security was never meant to fully fund retirement.
POVERTY AND ELDERLY
Social Security is a critical component of the financial security of millions of retirees – especially for future generations of the nation’s elderly poor.
·Social Security provides more than half of the total income for almost 60% of beneficiaries.
·For almost 30%, it provides more than 90% of income.
·It also covers 4.8 million widowers, 5 million disabled workers and 3.8 million children of deceased workers.
·80% of American workers pay more Social Security taxes than federal income tax.
Reducing poverty among the elderly is Social Security’s major accomplishment to date.The poverty rate among the elderly in 2000 was approximately 10%, down from a rate of 35.2% in 1959.Without Social Security, the poverty rate among the elderly would be 48%.
Preserving Social Security matters everywhere, but particularly in Kentucky.Our population is older and poorer than most.In 2003 more than $7 billion came into Kentucky through the Social Security program.Without it 54.6% of Kentucky senior citizens would live in poverty.10.7% do.
Surveys show that many Americans want a safety net.The system they have been use to has security in its name.A lot of people like the ownership society but they want it with a warranty.
Social Security is often described as the most popular government program, and Americans collectively have come to rely on it for their retirement years. But the long-term viability of Social Security must be addressed in the very near future.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants strongly urges that, before taking a position on a possible solution to the funding shortfall, policymakers and the public need to gain a clear understanding of the issues involved in reforming Social Security. The goal of this report is to foster informed discussion by providing unbiased facts and analysis.
The Situation
According to the Social Security Administration’s “best guess” (intermediate) assumptions, the Social Security Trust Fund surplus will peak in 2028. Then it will decline steadily until 2042, at which time the Trust Fund will be exhausted. However, inadequate funds do not mean zero benefits. If no changes are made to Social Security, beneficiaries could receive full scheduled benefits through 2042. Thereafter, scheduled benefits would have to be reduced by 27 percent. In 2078, benefits would have to be reduced by 32 percent. This Social Security “deficit” could be funded by an immediate infusion of $3.54 trillion; by increasing the payroll tax rate from its current level of 12.4 percent to 14.3 percent; or by reducing current scheduled benefits 12.6 percent.
Although the intermediate assumptions are reasonable there is still considerable uncertainty about actual results. Under Social Security’s high-cost projections, the Trust Fund peaks in 2021 and is entirely depleted by 2031. Under low-cost projections, the Trust Fund would not be depleted and there is no long-term financing problem.
Poverty and Elderly
Social Security is a critical component of the financial security of millions of retirees – especially for future generations of the nation’s elderly poor. Social Security provides more than half of the total income for almost 60 percent of beneficiaries. For almost 30 percent, it provides more than 90 percent of income.
Reducing poverty among the elderly is Social Security’s major accomplishment to date. The poverty rate among the elderly in 2000 was approximately 10 percent, down from a rate of 35.2 percent in 1959. Without Social Security, the poverty rate among the elderly would be 48 percent.
Fairness – Economic and Otherwise
Social Security was created as a pay-as-you-go system. Most of today’s Social Security recipients are receiving – and will continue to receive – more in benefits than their actuarial “fair share” based on their contributions. Even if all promised benefits were paid, future retirees, particularly singles, two-earner couples and those with high incomes, will earn below-market rate returns on their contributions.
The rate of return earned on an individual’s Social Security contributions is affected by gender, marital status, and income level. Social policy considerations weaken the direct link between contributions made and benefits received. The Social Security benefit formula includes a declining fraction of income in the calculation. As a result, low income beneficiaries benefit from the formula, high income beneficiaries do not. Married couples benefit from spousal and survivor benefits.
Reform plans to create personal savings accounts within the Social Security system would move the program away from a pay-as-you-go social insurance program and make it more like a defined-contribution pension plan. This will result in less redistribution of income (1) from high- to low-income earners; (2) from single individuals to married couples; and (3) from two-earner couples to one-earner couples.
Impact on Labor and Savings
Although analysts do not believe that Social Security taxes have much impact on the overall labor supply, payroll taxes may affect labor supplied by individuals for whom working is not a necessity. The Social Security benefit rules also appear to affect decisions about early retirement and the amount of work retirees plan to perform during retirement.
Increased national saving is a key to increased capital formation, productivity, and long-term economic growth. The current pay-as-you-go Social Security system may have decreased workers’ overall saving rates. The anticipated shortfall in future benefits may encourage workers to save more, but the magnitude of these affects is subject to debate.
Restoring Fiscal Balance
There are four general methods of improving the financial condition of the Social Security Trust Fund: (1) reducing benefits; (2) increasing revenues; (3) improving the rate of return on Trust Fund assets; and (4) other revenue sources, such as appropriating Treasury general funds.
Benefit reductions can be accomplished through across-the-board cuts, means-testing, raising the retirement age, or changing the inflation-adjustments used to determine benefits. Revenues can be increased by raising the payroll tax rate, raising the cap on taxable income, extending the payroll tax to all government workers, raising income taxes on Social Security benefits, and diverting general tax revenues to the Trust Fund.
Investing in Private Securities
If Social Security remains a pay-as-you-go system, the average rates of return on Social Security contributions will eventually decline below rates of return historically available in financial markets. Even if Social Security became a fully funded system, its rate of return could not significantly improve unless the restriction to invest solely in U.S. government securities was lifted.
Investing Trust Fund assets, as a whole, in the stock market could improve Social Security’s financial condition, because – over long periods of time – the stock market generally outperforms the return on U.S. government securities. However, investing in private securities adds risk and increased administrative costs to the financing equation. Further, the potential for large-scale government investment in private equities could result in undue political influence on markets.
Personal Accounts
Under a system of personal accounts, a portion of payroll taxes paid by each worker under age 55 would be redirected from the Trust Fund to that worker’s own personal account. Some restrictions would be imposed on investment and payout options, but the personal account holder could generally expect to earn a higher return on their contributions.
Personal accounts would not entirely eliminate traditional Social Security retirement benefits. However, under most proposals reviewed in this report, traditional benefits would be reduced regardless of whether an individual chose to participate in the voluntary account program.
Benefit Offsets: Workers choosing to contribute to personal accounts would receive benefits from their personal account along with traditional benefits that have been reduced according to the amount redirected to an investment in a personal account. The greater this “benefit offset,” the less attractive the personal account option will be, but large benefit offsets make personal account proposals less costly for the Trust Fund.
Risk Shifting: Personal accounts expose account holders to uncertainty about their future benefit levels because of market performance risks. Although some of this risk can be eliminated through diversification; the rest may be transferred to the federal government in the form of minimum benefit guarantees.
Administrative Costs: The costs to administer private accounts have a large impact on the benefits ultimately available to retirees. For an individual with average earnings of $30,000, contributing 2 percent of earnings to an individual account, administrative costs of 0.1 percent of assets could allow an accumulated balance of $125,430 by retirement. However, if administrative costs were 1.0 percent, the accumulated balance would be approximately $98,000 – a 22 percent reduction.
Funding Transition Costs
Over the 75-year horizon used to score Social Security reforms, the creation of personal accounts by themselves worsen the financial condition of the Social Security Trust Funds. During the long transition to a personal account system, fewer funds would be available to pay traditional benefits to current retirees and near-retirees, because contributions diverted to the personal accounts of younger workers would result in lower contribution levels into the Trust Fund.
Therefore, extra funds from outside the program or cost savings from inside the program would be needed to fund the transition. All personal account proposals considered in this report include transfers from the Treasury general fund to the Social Security Trust Fund.
QUESTIONS FOR EVALUATING PERSONAL ACCOUNT PROPOSALS
Among the most important issues to consider under any personal account proposal are the following:
·To what degree, and over what period, would benefits under the existing system remain in place?
·Will there be a safety net for low-income beneficiaries?
·How much choice will individuals have about:
oParticipating?
oInvestments?
oDistributions?
·Will benefit payments be subject to tax? If so, at what rate?
·What will the plan “cost” beneficiaries in lost traditional benefits as a trade-off for a personal account?
Tips for payroll and human resource record retention, including information on how long to keep OSHA,IRS/SSA/FUTA, FLSA/INRCA, Family Medical Leave and Supplemental records.
OSHA Documents – 5 years
·Log of all occupational illnesses/accidents
·Other OSHA records
IRS/SSA/FUTA documents – 4 years
·Duplicate copies of tax returns/tax deposits
·Returned copies of Form W-2
·Canceled/voided checks
·Employee’s name/address/occupation/social security number
·Amount/date of payments for wages, annuities, pensions, tips; fair market value of wages-in-kind
·Record of allocated tips
·Amount of wages subject to withholding
·Taxes withheld (and date if different from pay date)
·Copies of Form W-4 (for at least four years after the date the last return was filed using the information on the Form W-4)
·Agreements to withhold additional amounts
·Dates when employee was absent due to injury and received payments; amount/rate of such payments (by employer or third party)
·Copies of Forms 941, 940, W-2, W-3, Schedule A, Schedule B, and other returns filed on magnetic media
FLSA/INRCA Record Retention – 3 years
·Name of employee/address/occupation/birth date/sex
·Hours worked each day/week
·Amount and date of payment
·Amounts earned for straight time and overtime/additions to and deductions from wages
·Collective bargaining agreements
·Sales and purchase records
·Immigration Reform and Control Act, Form I-9-three years after date of hire or one year after date of termination (whichever is later)
FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE Record-Keeping Requirements - 3 years
The following records must be kept for at least three years, in any format, and made available no more frequently than once every 12 months for Department of Labor inspection.
·Name, address, occupation rate of pay, daily and weekly hours worked per pay period
·Additions to and deductions from wages, total compensation
·Dates of FMLA leave (or hours if taken in increments of less than one day)
·Copies of written notices of intention to take FMLA leave provided by employee
·Copies of general and specific notices provided to employees
·Plan descriptions/policies and procedures dealing with unpaid and paid leaves
The Treasury Department and the IRS have proposed regulations that identify occupations that customarily and regularly receive tips, and define "qualified tips" that eligible tip recipients may claim for the "no tax on tips" deduction under Code Sec. 224. This deduction was enacted as part of the the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21).
The Treasury Department and the IRS have proposed regulations that identify occupations that customarily and regularly receive tips, and define"qualified tips"that eligible tip recipients may claim for the"no tax on tips"deduction underCode Sec. 224. This deduction was enacted as part of the the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21).
Background
UnderCode Sec. 224, an eligible individual can claim an income tax deduction for qualified tips received in tax years 2025 through 2028. The deduction is limited to $25,000 per tax year, and starts to phase out when modified adjusted gross income is above $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers).
An employer must report qualified tips on an employee‘s Form W-2, or the employee must report the tips on Form 4137. A service recipient must report qualified tips on an information return furnished to a nonemployee payee (Form 1099-NEC, Form 1099-MISC, Form 1099-K).
If an individual tip recipient is"married"(underCode Sec. 7703), the deduction applies only if the individual and his or her spouse file a joint return. The deduction is not allowed unless the taxpayer includes his or her social security number (SSN) on their income tax return for the tax year. For this purpose, a SSN is valid only if it is issued to a U.S. citizen or a person authorized to work in the United States, and before the due date of the taxpayer’s return.
What is a Qualified Tip?
A"qualified tip"is a cash tip received in an occupation that customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024. An amount isnota qualified tip unless (1) the amount received is paid voluntarily without any consequence for nonpayment, is not the subject of negotiation, and is determined by the payor; (2) the trade or business in which the individual receives the amount is not a specified service trade or business underCode Sec. 199A(d)(2); and (3) other requirements established in regulations or other guidance are satisfied.
The proposed regulations define qualified tips—and payments that arenotqualified tips— based on several factors, including the following:
Qualified tips must be paid in cash or an equivalent medium, such as check, credit card, debit card, gift card, tangible or intangible tokens that are readily exchangeable for a fixed amount in cash, or another form of electronic settlement or mobile payment application that is denominated in cash.
Qualified tipsdo notinclude items paid in any medium other than cash, such as event tickets, meals, services, or other assets that are not exchangeable for a fixed amount in cash (such as most digital assets).
Qualified tips must be received from customers. For employees, qualified tips can be received through a mandatory or voluntary tip-sharing arrangement, such as a tip pool.
Qualified tips must be paid voluntarily by the customer, and not be subject to negotiation.
Qualified tipsdo notinclude some service charges. For example, if a restaurant imposes an automatic 18-percent service charge for large parties and distributes that amount to waiters, bussers and kitchen staff, the amounts distributed are not qualified tips if the charge is added with no option for the customer to disregard or modify it.
Qualified tipsdo notinclude amounts received for an illegal activity (a service the performance of which is a felony or misdemeanor under applicable law), prostitution services, or pornographic activity.
Qualified tipsdo notinclude tips received by an employee or other service provider who has an ownership interest in or is employed by the tip payor.
The proposed regulations also include examples that illustrate some of the requirements and restrictions.
Occupations that Customarily and Regularly Receive Tips
The proposed regulations list the occupations that customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024. For each occupation, the list provides a numeric Treasury Tipped Occupation Code (TTOC), an occupation title, a description of the types of services performed in the occupation, illustrative examples of specific occupations, and the related Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) system code(s) published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The list groups the eligible occupations into eight categories:
Beverage and Food Service—includes bartenders; wait staff; food servers outside of a restaurant; dining room and cafeteria attendants and bartender helpers; chefs and cooks; food preparation workers; fast food and counter workers; dishwashers; host staff, restaurant, lounge, and coffee shop; bakers
Entertainment and Events—includes gambling dealers; gambling change persons and booth cashiers; gambling cage workers; gambling and sports book writers and runners; dancers; musicians and singers; disc jockeys (but not radio disc jockeys); entertainers and performers; digital content creators; ushers, lobby attendants, and ticket takers; locker room, coatroom, and dressing room attendants
Hospitality and Guest Services—includes baggage porters and bellhops; concierges; hotel, motel, and resort desk clerks; maids and housekeeping cleaners
Home Services—includes home maintenance and repair workers; home landscaping and groundskeeping workers; home electricians; home plumbers; home heating and air conditioning mechanics and installers; home appliance installers and repairers; home cleaning service workers; locksmiths; roadside assistance workers
Personal Services—includes personal care and service workers; private event planners; private event and portrait photographers; private event videographers; event officiants; pet caretakers; tutors; nannies and babysitters
Personal Appearance and Wellness—includes skincare specialists; massage therapists; barbers, hairdressers , hairstylists, and cosmetologists; shampooers; manicurists and pedicurists; eyebrow threading and waxing technicians; makeup artists; exercise trainers and group fitness instructors; tattoo artists and piercers; tailors; shoe and leather workers and repairers
Recreation and Instruction—includes golf caddies; self-enrichment teachers; recreational and tour pilots; tour guides; travel guides; sports and recreation instructors
Transportation and Delivery—includes parking and valet attendants; taxi and rideshare drivers and chauffeurs; shuttle drivers; goods delivery people; personal vehicle and equipment cleaners; private and charter bus drivers; water taxi operators and charter boat workers; rickshaw, pedicab, and carriage drivers; home movers
Applicability Dates
The proposed regulations apply for tax years beginning after December 31, 2024. Taxpayers may rely on the proposed regulations for those tax years, and on or before the date the final regulations are published in the Federal Register, but only if the proposed regulations are followed in their entirety and in a consistent manner.
Request for Comments, Public Hearing
Written or electronic comments must be received by October 22, 2025 (30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register). Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov), or on paper submitted to: CC:PA:01:PR (REG-110032-25), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.
A public hearing is being held on October 23, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET). Requests to speak and outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing must be received by October 22, 2025; if no outlines are received by that date, the public hearing will be cancelled. Requests to attend the public hearing must be received by 5:00 p.m. ET on October 21, 2023.
The IRS issued final regulations implementing the Roth catch-up contribution requirement and other statutory changes to catch-up contributions made by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). The regulations affect qualified retirement plans that allow catch-up contributions (including 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, governmental plans, SEPs and SIMPLE plans) and their participants. The regulations generally apply for contribtions in tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, with extensions for collectively bargained, multiemployer, and governmental plans. However, plans may elect to apply the final rules in earlier tax years.
The IRS issued final regulations implementing the Roth catch-up contribution requirement and other statutory changes to catch-up contributions made by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). The regulations affect qualified retirement plans that allow catch-up contributions (including 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, governmental plans, SEPs and SIMPLE plans) and their participants. The regulations generally apply for contribtions in tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, with extensions for collectively bargained, multiemployer, and governmental plans. However, plans may elect to apply the final rules in earlier tax years.
The SECURE 2.0 Act amended the catch-up contribution provision to allow an increased contribution limit for participants aged 60 through 63 and an increased contribution limit for certain SIMPLE plans. The final regulations provide that SIMPLE plans may allow participant to take advantage of one of these increased contribution limits, but not both. However, beginning with the 2025 calendar year, a SIMPLE plan that provides for increased contribution limits for all participants may instead permit participants attaining age 60 to 63 to contribute the full amount allowed for that age group.
With respect to mandatory Roth catch-up contributions for particpants whose income exceeds a statutory threshold, the final regulations allow 401(k) and 403(b) plans to automatically treat catch-up contributions as Roth for affected participants, provided an opt-out opportunity is offered. The final regulations do not include a rule allowing deemed Roth elections for all employees' catch-up contributions, only for those employees whose income exceeds the threshold. In response to comments, the final regulations provide that deemed elections must cease within a reasonable period of time following the date on which the employee no longer meets the mandatory Roth threshold or an amended Form W-2 is filed or furnished to the employee indicating that the employee no longer meets the mandatory Roth threshold. As a result, Roth catch-up contributions made pursuant to the deemed election before the end of the reasonable period of time need not be recharacterized as pre-tax catch-up contributions. The IRS further indicated that the plan must be amended to implement deemed Roth elections, and that the deadline for adopting amendments implementing the SECURE 2.0 Act is generally December 31, 2026.
The final regulations provide two correction methods to address pre-tax contributions that should have been designated Roth. First, a plan may transfer pre-tax contributions to the participant's Roth account and report the contribution as an elective deferral that is a designated Roth contribution on the participant's Form W-2. This correction method is available only if the participant's Form W-2 for that year has not yet been filed or furnished to the participant. Alternatively, the plan can directly roll over the elective deferrals that would be catch-up contributions if they had been designated Roth contributions (adjusted for earnings and losses) from the participant’s pre-tax account to the participant’s designated Roth account and report the rollover on Form 1099-R. Failures do not need to be corrected if the amount of the pre-tax elective deferral that was required to be a designated Roth contribution does not exceed $250, or if the participant was incorrectly treated as subject to the Roth catch-up contribution requirement due to a Form W-2 that is later amended.
Revenue Procedure 2025-28 instructs taxpayers on how to make various elections, file amended returns or change accounting methods for research or experimental expenditures as provided under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21). The revenue procedure also provides transitional rules, modifiesRev. Proc. 2025-23, and grants an extension of time for partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, estates and trusts, and exempt organizations to file superseding 2024 federal income tax returns.
Revenue Procedure 2025-28 instructs taxpayers on how to make various elections, file amended returns or change accounting methods for research or experimental expenditures as provided under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21). The revenue procedure also provides transitional rules, modifiesRev. Proc. 2025-23, and grants an extension of time for partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, estates and trusts, and exempt organizations to file superseding 2024 federal income tax returns.
Background
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) required taxpayers to capitalize and amortize specified research or experimental expenditures over 5 years for domestic research or 15 years for foreign research, beginning with taxable years after December 31, 2021. The OBBB Act, enacted July 4, significantly modified these rules by adding newCode Sec. 174Ato allow immediate deduction of domestic research or experimental expenditures while retaining the capitalization and amortization requirements only for foreign research expenditures.
Code Sec. 174Aprovides that domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, are generally deductible when paid or incurred. Alternatively, taxpayers may elect underCode Sec. 174A(c)to capitalize these expenditures and amortize them over at least 60 months, beginning when the taxpayer first realizes benefits from the expenditures.
The OBBB Act also provides transition relief, including retroactive application options for small business taxpayers and methods for recovering previously capitalized amounts.
Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) Elections and Revocations
Eligible small business taxpayers may make late elections under Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) to reduce their research credit in lieu of reducing their deductible research expenditures or revoke priorCode Sec. 280C(c)(2)elections. These are available for applicable taxable years where the original return was filed before September 15, 2025.
Elections are made by adjusting the research credit amount on amended returns, attaching amended Form 6765 marked with the appropriate revenue procedure reference, and including required declarations.
Code Sec. 174A(c) Election Procedures
For domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, taxpayers may elect to capitalize and amortize these expenditures underCode Sec. 174A(c). The election must be made by the due date of the return for the first applicable taxable year by attaching a statement specifying the amortization period (not less than 60 months) and the month when benefits are first realized.
Automatic Consent for Accounting Method Changes
Rev. Proc. 2025-28modifiesRev. Proc. 2025-23to provide automatic consent procedures for various accounting method changes related to research expenditures:
changes to comply withCode Sec. 174for expenditures paid or incurred before January 1, 2025;
changes to implement the newCode Sec. 174Adeduction or amortization methods for expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 2024; and
changes to comply with modifiedCode Sec. 174requirements for foreign research expenditures.
For the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2024, taxpayers may use statements in lieu of Form 3115 for certain accounting method changes, with simplified procedures and waived duplicate filing requirements.
Small Business Retroactive Election
Small business taxpayers meeting theCode Sec. 448(c)gross receipts test (average annual gross receipts of $31,000,000 or less for 2025) may elect to retroactively applyCode Sec. 174Ato domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. This election allows eligible taxpayers to either deduct these expenditures in the year paid or incurred or elect theCode Sec. 174A(c)amortization method.
The election is made by attaching a statement entitled "FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.03 OF REV. PROC. 2025-28" to the taxpayer's original or amended federal income tax return for each applicable taxable year. The statement must include the taxpayer's identification information, declarations regarding tax shelter status and gross receipts test compliance, and specification of the chosen method.
Elections made on amended returns must be filed by July 6, 2026, subject to the normal statute of limitations under Code Sec. 6511 for refund claims.
Relief for Previously Filed Returns
Rev. Proc. 2025-28grants automatic six-month extensions for eligible taxpayers to file superseding returns for 2024 taxable years. This relief is available to taxpayers who filed returns before September 15, 2025, without extensions, and need to make elections or method changes provided by the revenue procedure.
The extension applies to partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, trusts, estates, and exempt organizations with 2024 taxable years ending before September 15, 2025, where the original due date was before September 15, 2025.
Effective Date
Most provisions ofRev. Proc. 2025-28are effective August 28, 2025. The modified automatic change procedures apply to Forms 3115 filed after August 28, 2025, with transition rules for taxpayers who properly filed duplicate copies before November 15, 2025.
The shareholders of S corporations engaged in cannabis sales could not include wages disallowed under Code Sec. 280E when calculating the Code Sec. 199A deduction. The Court reasoned that only wages "properly allocable to qualified business income" qualify, and nondeductible wages cannot be so allocated under the statute.
The shareholders of S corporations engaged in cannabis sales could not include wages disallowed underCode Sec. 280Ewhen calculating theCode Sec. 199Adeduction. The Court reasoned that only wages"properly allocable to qualified business income"qualify, and nondeductible wages cannot be so allocated under the statute.
The individuals owned three S corporations and reported pass-through income for the tax years at issue. Two corporations, engaged in cannabis sales, were subject toCode Sec. 280E, which bars deductions for expenses of businesses trafficking in controlled substances. Both entities paid significant W-2 wages, but portions were nondeductible underCode Sec. 280E. Petitioners claimed the full amount of reported wages in computing theCode Sec. 199Adeduction.
The IRS reduced the deductions, asserting that only deductible wages could count as W-2 wages underCode Sec. 199A. The Court agreed, finding thatCode Sec. 199A(b)(4)(B)excludes any amount not"properly allocable to qualified business income,"andCode Sec. 199A(c)(3)(A)(ii)limits qualified items to those"allowed in determining taxable income."Because nondeductible wages are not allowed in determining taxable income, they cannot be W-2 wages."Although certain amounts may have been reported by an employer to an employee in a Form W-2,"the Court explained,"those amounts do not constitute"W-2 wages"for purposes of199Aif they are not properly allocated to qualified business income."
A dissenting judge argued that Congress intended the wage limitation to encourage job creation and that wages properly allocable to a trade or business should count regardless of deductibility. The majority, however, concluded that statutory text foreclosed this interpretation.
A married couple was not entitled to claim a plug-in vehicle credit after the year in which their vehicle was first placed in service.
A married couple was not entitled to claim a plug-in vehicle credit after the year in which their vehicle was first placed in service. The Tax Court explained thatCode Sec. 30Dprovides a one-time credit available only in the year a qualified vehicle is first placed in service, meaning when it is ready and available for its intended function. The couple purchased a new plug-in electric vehicle and continued to claim the credit in later years. The IRS disallowed the credit for the tax year at issue and determined a deficiency. An accuracy-related penalty was also proposed but later conceded. Relying on regulations interpreting similar provisions under the general business credit, the Court emphasized that once the vehicle was in use in the year of purchase, it was considered placed in service. Accordingly, the Court held that the credit could not be claimed again in subsequent years.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has proposed regulations that would amend the Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Program and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Filing Requirements for registered investment advisers (IA AML Rule) by delaying the obligations of covered investment advisers from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has proposed regulations that would amend the Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Program and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Filing Requirements for registered investment advisers (IA AML Rule) by delaying the obligations of covered investment advisers from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028. The proposed regulation follows an exemptive relief order issued earlier this summer (FinCEN Exemptive Relief Order, August 5, 2025).
The IA AML Rule requires covered investment advisers to establish AML/CFT programs, report suspicious activity, and keep relevant records, among other requirements.
By delaying the effective date, FinCEN states that it will have an opportunity to review the IA AML Rule, and ensure that the rule is effectively tailored to the diverse business models and risk profiles of firms in the investment adviser sector. According to FinCEN, the review may also provide an opportunity to reduce any unnecessary or duplicative regulatory burden, and ensure the IA AML Rule strikes an appropriate balance between cost and benefit, while still adequately protecting the U.S. financial system and guarding against money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit finance risks.
Request for Comments
FinCEN invites interested parties to submit comments on the proposed delay in the effective date of the IA AML Rule. Written or electronic comments must be received by October 22, 2025 (30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register). Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov), or by mail to: Policy Division, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183. Refer to Docket Number FINCEN-2025-0072 and RIN 1506-AB58 and 1506-AB69.
The Affordable Care Act—enacted nearly five years ago—phased in many new requirements affecting individuals and employers. One of the most far-reaching requirements, the individual mandate, took effect this year and will be reported on 2014 income tax returns filed in 2015. The IRS is bracing for an avalanche of questions about taxpayer reporting on 2014 returns and, if liable, any shared responsibility payment. For many taxpayers, the best approach is to be familiar with the basics before beginning to prepare and file their returns.
The Affordable Care Act—enacted nearly five years ago—phased in many new requirements affecting individuals and employers. One of the most far-reaching requirements, the individual mandate, took effect this year and will be reported on 2014 income tax returns filed in 2015. The IRS is bracing for an avalanche of questions about taxpayer reporting on 2014 returns and, if liable, any shared responsibility payment. For many taxpayers, the best approach is to be familiar with the basics before beginning to prepare and file their returns.
Individual mandate
Beginning January 1, 2014, the Affordable Care Act requires individuals (and their dependents) to have minimum essential health care coverage or make a shared responsibility payment, unless exempt. This is commonly called the "individual mandate."
Employer reporting
Nearly all employer-provided health coverage is treated as minimum essential coverage. This includes self-insured plans, COBRA coverage, and retiree coverage. Large employers will provide employees with new Form 1095-C, Employer-Provided Health Insurance Coverage and Offer, which will report the type of coverage provided. The IRS has encouraged employers to voluntarily report starting in 2015 for the 2014 plan year. Mandatory reporting begins in 2016 for the 2015 plan year.
Marketplace coverage
Coverage obtained through the Affordable Care Act Marketplace is also treated as minimum essential coverage. Marketplace enrollees should expect to receive new Form 1095-A, Health Insurance Marketplace Statement, from the Marketplace. Individuals with Marketplace coverage will indicate on their returns that they have minimum essential coverage. Because so many individuals with Marketplace coverage also qualify for a special tax credit, they will also likely need to complete new Form 8962, Premium Tax Credit (discussed below).
Medicare, Medicaid and other government coverage
Medicare, TRICARE, CHIP, Medicaid, and other government health programs are treated as minimum essential coverage. There are some very narrow exceptions but overall, most government-sponsored coverage is minimum essential coverage.
Exemptions
Some individuals are expressly exempt under the Affordable Care Act from making a shared responsibility payment. There are multiple categories of exemptions. They include:
Short coverage gap
Religious conscience
Federally-recognized Native American nation
Income below income tax return filing requirement
The short coverage gap applies to individuals who lacked minimum essential coverage for less than three consecutive months during 2014. They will not be responsible for making a shared responsibility payment. Individuals who are members of a religious organization recognized as conscientiously opposed to accepting insurance benefits also are exempt from the individual mandate. Similarly, members of a federally-recognized Native American nation are exempt. If a taxpayer’s income is below the minimum threshold for filing a return, he or she is exempt from making a shared responsibility payment.
The IRS has developed new Form 8965, Health Coverage Exemptions. Taxpayers exempt from the individual mandate will file Form 8965 with their federal income tax return.
Shared responsibility payment
All other individuals - individuals without minimum essential coverage and who are not exempt - must make a shared responsibility payment when they file their 2014 return. For 2014, the payment amount is the greater of: One percent of the person’s household income that is above the tax return threshold for their filing status; or a flat dollar amount, which is $95 per adult and $47.50 per child, limited to a maximum of $285. The individual shared responsibility payment is capped at the cost of the national average premium for the bronze level health plan available through the Marketplace in 2014. Taxpayers will report the amount of their individual shared responsibility payment on their 2014 Form 1040.
The IRS has cautioned that it will offset a taxpayer’s refund if he or she fails to make a shared responsibility payment if required. However, the Affordable Care Act prevents the IRS from using its lien and levy authority to collect an unpaid shared responsibility payment.
Code Sec. 36B credit
Only individuals who obtain coverage through the Marketplace are eligible for the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has reported that more than two-thirds of Marketplace enrollees are eligible for the credit and many enrollees have received advance payment of the credit.
All advance payments of the credit must be reconciled on new Form 8962, which will be filed with the taxpayer’s income tax return. Taxpayers will calculate the actual credit they qualified for based on their actual 2014 income. If the actual premium tax credit is larger than the sum of advance payments made during the year, the individual will be entitled to an additional credit amount. If the actual credit is smaller than the sum of the advance payments, the individual’s refund will be reduced or the amount of tax owed will be increased, subject to a sliding scale of income-based repayment caps.
A change in circumstance, such as marriage or the birth/adoption of a child, could increase or decrease the amount of the credit. Individuals who are receiving an advance payment of the credit should notify the Marketplace of any life changes so the amount of the advance payment can be adjusted if necessary. Please contact our office if you have any questions about the Code Sec. 36B credit.
IRS officials have told Congress that the agency is ready for the new filings and reporting requirements. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
Lawmakers are scheduled to return to work after the November elections for the so-called "lame-duck" Congress. Despite what is expected to be a short session, there is likely to be movement on important tax bills.
Lawmakers are scheduled to return to work after the November elections for the so-called "lame-duck" Congress. Despite what is expected to be a short session, there is likely to be movement on important tax bills.
Tax extenders
Every two years, like clockwork, the same scenario seems to play-out in Congress. Many popular but temporary tax incentives expire and lawmakers debate whether to extend them, make them permanent or abolish them. This year is no exception. The new filing season is fast approaching and many tax breaks are, at this time, unavailable because they expired after 2013.
The expired tax breaks are known as "tax extenders." Included within this catch-call category are a variety of tax incentives for individuals and businesses. Some are widely-claimed and are often inadvertently believed by taxpayers to be permanent...they are not. Individuals who claimed the state and local sales tax deduction, higher education tuition deduction, residential energy property credit, and others, in past years cannot claim them on their 2014 returns, unless the incentives are extended. The same is true for many business tax breaks, such as bonus depreciation, enhanced Code Sec. 179 small business expensing and the research tax credit. All of these incentives expired after 2013.
Congressional logjam
The last extension of the extenders was in the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. At that time, many lawmakers wanted to discontinue the practice of renewing the extenders every two years and make some permanent while eliminating others. However, the House and Senate have taken different approaches. The Senate Finance Committee approved the EXPIRE Act (S. 2260) earlier this year. The bill extends the expired tax breaks two years. The House, on the other hand, has voted to make permanent only some of the extenders, such as bonus depreciation and Code Sec. 179 expensing.
It is unclear how lawmakers will proceed before year-end. The EXPIRE Act, while approved by committee, has yet to get a vote on the Senate floor. House GOP leaders, who endorsed the piece-meal approach to making permanent some of the extenders, have not said if they will support another comprehensive temporary extension like the EXPIRE Act. It is possible that lawmakers will punt the extenders to the new Congress that meets in January. In that case, a delayed start to the filing season is almost guaranteed. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
More tax bills
Some stand-alone tax-related bills could be passed before year-end. The ABLE Act (S. 313) enjoys bipartisan support. The ABLE Act would create new tax-free savings accounts for individuals with disabilities. Funds in the accounts could be used for qualified medical, transportation, housing, and education expenses. The Don’t Forget Our Fallen Public Safety Heroes Act (S. 2912) passed the Senate in September and could be approved by the House before year-end. The bill would exclude from income certain benefits paid to the family of a public safety officer who dies in the line of duty.
IRS funding
The federal government, including the IRS, is currently operating under a stop-gap spending bill. The temporary spending bill is scheduled to expire in December. The lame-duck Congress is expected to approve an omnibus spending bill to keep the government open. Earlier this year, appropriators in the House and Senate reached very different conclusions on funding for the IRS in 2015. House appropriators voted to cut funding; Senate appropriators voted to increase funding. The IRS has been operating under tight budgetary restraints for several years and that pattern is expected to continue into 2015.
Tax technical corrections
Congress may also take up a package of tax technical corrections. These bills are not new tax laws but are corrections to language in existing laws. For example, lawmakers may have intended that a certain language be included in a final bill and that language was left out. Frequently, these corrections are clerical. These corrections are intended to facilitate the administration of law.
If you have any questions about the extenders or year-end tax legislation, please contact our office.
In certain cases, moving expenses may be tax deductible by individuals. Three key criteria must be satisfied: the move must closely-related to the start of work; a distance test must be satisfied and a time test also must be met.
In certain cases, moving expenses may be tax deductible by individuals. Three key criteria must be satisfied: the move must closely-related to the start of work; a distance test must be satisfied and a time test also must be met.
Closely-related to the start of work
The move must be closely-related to the start of work at a new location. Moving for non-work related reasons is not relevant. The closely-related requirement encompasses both a time threshold and a place threshold. The IRS has explained that closely-related in time generally means an individual can consider moving expenses incurred within one year from the date he or she first reported to work at the new location as closely related in time to the start of work. Closely-related in place generally means that the distance from the individual's new home to the new job location is not more than the distance from his or her former home to the new job location.
Distance
An individual's move satisfies the distance test if his or her new main location is at least 50 miles farther from his or her former home than the old main job location was from the former home. Note that the distance test takes into account only the location of the individual's former home. An individual's main job location is the location where he or she spends most of his or her working hours. Individuals may have more than one job. In that case, the IRS has explained that an individual's main job location depends on the facts in each case. Among the factors to take into account are the total time the individual spends at each place; the amount of work performed at each place and the amount of wages earned at each place. If an individual previously had no employment, or had experienced a period of unemployment, the new job location must be at least 50 miles from the individual's old home.
Time
Time for purposes of the moving deduction looks at an individual's hours of work and where that work is performed. An individual who is a wage earner (employed by another) must work full-time for at least 39 weeks during the first 12 months immediately following his or her arrival in the general area of the new job location. Self-employed individuals must work full time for at least 39 weeks during the first 12 months and for a total of at least 78 weeks during the first 24 months immediately following their arrival in the general area of the new work location.
Special rules apply to members of the U.S. Armed Forces as well as employees who are seasonal workers, individuals who have temporary absences from work, and others.
If you have any questions about the moving deduction, please contact our office.
The IRS continues to ramp-up its work to fight identity theft/refund fraud and recently announced new rules allowing the use of abbreviated (truncated) personal identification numbers and employer identification numbers. Instead of showing a taxpayer's full Social Security number (SSN) or other identification number on certain forms, asterisks or Xs replace the first five digits and only the last four digits appear. The final rules, however, do impose some important limits on the use of truncated taxpayer identification numbers (known as "TTINs").
The IRS continues to ramp-up its work to fight identity theft/refund fraud and recently announced new rules allowing the use of abbreviated (truncated) personal identification numbers and employer identification numbers. Instead of showing a taxpayer's full Social Security number (SSN) or other identification number on certain forms, asterisks or Xs replace the first five digits and only the last four digits appear. The final rules, however, do impose some important limits on the use of truncated taxpayer identification numbers (known as "TTINs").
Note. A TTIN typically appears as XXX-XX-1234 or ***-**-1234.
Identity theft/refund fraud
The IRS has more than 3,000 employees working identity-theft related issues. They are investigating refund fraud and assisting taxpayers - both individuals and businesses - that have been victims of identity theft. The IRS has also upgraded its filters that screen tax returns for indications of refund fraud. Between 2011 and 2014, the IRS reported that it prevented more than $50 billion in fraudulent refunds.
Protecting personal information from disclosure is one important tool in the IRS's toolshed to fight identity theft. IRS data systems contain personal information, such as SSNs, EINs, individual taxpayer identification numbers (ITINs) and adoption taxpayer identification numbers (ATINs) on millions of taxpayers. To thwart potential identity thieves, the agency launched a pilot program in 2009 to allow the use of TTINs. The goal of the pilot program was to reduce the risk of identity theft that could result from the inclusion of a taxpayer's entire identifying number on a payee statement or other document.
Proposed regulations
The IRS viewed the pilot program as a success and issued proposed regulations in 2013. Under the proposed regulations, TTINs would be available as an alternative to using a taxpayer's SSN, ITIN, or ATIN. The proposed regulations also permitted the use of TTINs to electronic payee statements as well as paper payee statements.
Expanded use
In July, the IRS announced that it was finalizing the proposed TTIN rules. The final rules also expand the use of TTINs to:
Employer identification numbers. The final rules allow the use of abbreviated employer identification numbers (EINs) in certain cases.
More documents. The final regulations permit the use of TTINs on any federal tax-related payee statement or other document required to be furnished to another person unless specifically prohibited.
Voluntary
The IRS encourages the use of TTINs but did not make use of TTINs mandatory. The IRS also explained that use of a TTIN will not result in any penalty for failure to include a correct taxpayer identifying number on any payee statement or other document.
Limitations
The final regulations (officially known as TD 9765) place some limits on TTINs. A TTIN may not be used on a return filed with the IRS. This includes Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return. A TTIN also may not be used if a statute or regulation specifically requires use of an SSN, ITIN, ATIN, or EIN. Additionally, employers cannot use a TTIN on an employee's Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement.
If you have any questions about TTINs or identity theft/refund fraud, please contact our office.
U.S. taxpayers with foreign financial accounts must file an FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) if the aggregate value of their accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. The FBAR must be filed by June 30 of the current year to report the taxpayer's financial accounts for the prior year.
U.S. taxpayers with foreign financial accounts must file an FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) if the aggregate value of their accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. The FBAR must be filed by June 30 of the current year to report the taxpayer's financial accounts for the prior year.
A U.S. taxpayer must report the account not only if the taxpayer has a financial interest in the account, but also if the taxpayer has signature authority over the account. The account must be reported even if it produces no income, and whether or not the taxpayer receives any distributions from the account.
FinCEN
Reporting is required by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), not by the Internal Revenue Code. Taxpayers submit the proper form to Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), not the IRS. The form is not submitted with a tax return. However, FinCEN has delegated FBAR enforcement authority to the IRS.
New Form 114
In the past, taxpayers reported their accounts on Form TD F 90-22.1. However, effective for 2014 and subsequent years, taxpayers must report their accounts on new FinCEN Form 114. The June 30 deadline is firm; there is no extension for filing the form late. However, persons who belatedly discover the need to file an FBAR for a previous year can file on Form 114.
In the past, too, taxpayers reported their accounts on a paper form, but Form 114 is only available online, through the BSA E-Filing System website. Paper Form TD F 90-22.1 has been discontinued. This BSA E-Filing System allows the taxpayer to designate the year being reported, so taxpayers may use the same form to file late reports for a prior year. In addition, persons can now authorize a tax professional, such as an attorney, CPA, or enrolled agent, to file on their behalf, by designating an agent on BSA Form 114a.
If two persons jointly maintain an account, each must file an FBAR. However, spouses now qualify for an exception, and can file only one FBAR, provided the nonfiling spouse only owns accounts jointly with the filing spouse. The couple can complete a Form 114a, to authorize one spouse to file for the other, because the electronic system only accepts one signature for an FBAR.
Signature authority
Signature authority is authority to control the disposition of assets held in a foreign financial account. A person with a power of attorney over a foreign account must file an FBAR, even if the person never exercises the power of attorney.
FinCEN has considered amending the rules regarding signature authority. In the meantime, because there is some uncertainty about the meaning of signature authority, FinCEN has deferred FBAR filing by certain individuals that only have signature authority over, but no financial interest in, foreign financial accounts of their employer or a closely related entity. FinCEN Notice 2011-1 first provided an extension for these persons. In Notice 2013-1, FinCEN extended the due date for these persons to file, to June 30, 2015, while FinCEN further considers changes to the rules.
One of the most complex, if not the most complex, provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the employer shared responsibility requirement (the so-called "employer mandate") and related reporting of health insurance coverage. Since passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Obama administration has twice delayed the employer mandate and reporting. The employer mandate and reporting will generally apply to applicable large employers (ALE) starting in 2015 and to mid-size employers starting in 2016. Employers with fewer than 50 employees, have never been required, and continue to be exempt, from the employer mandate and reporting.
One of the most complex, if not the most complex, provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the employer shared responsibility requirement (the so-called "employer mandate") and related reporting of health insurance coverage. Since passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Obama administration has twice delayed the employer mandate and reporting. The employer mandate and reporting will generally apply to applicable large employers (ALE) starting in 2015 and to mid-size employers starting in 2016. Employers with fewer than 50 employees, have never been required, and continue to be exempt, from the employer mandate and reporting.
Employer mandate
The employer mandate under Code Sec. 4980H and employer reporting under Code Sec. 6056 are very connected. Code Sec. 4980H generally provides that an ALE is required to pay a penalty if it fails to offer minimum essential coverage and any full-time employee receives cost-sharing or the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit. An ALE would also pay a penalty if it offers coverage and any full-time employee receives cost-sharing or the Code Sec. 36B credit.
To receive the Code Sec. 36B credit, an individual must have obtained coverage through an Affordable Care Act Marketplace. The Marketplaces will report the names of individuals who receive the credit to the IRS. ALEs must report the terms and conditions of health care coverage provided to employees (This is known as Code Sec. 6056 reporting). The IRS will use all of this information to determine if the ALE must pay a penalty.
ALEs
Only ALEs are subject to the employer mandate and must report health insurance coverage under Code Sec. 6056. Employers with fewer than 50 employees are never subject to the employer mandate and do not have to report coverage under Code Sec. 6056.
In February, the Obama administration announced important transition rules for the employer mandate that affects Code Sec. 6056 reporting. The Obama administration limited the employer mandate in 2015 to employers with 100 or more full-time employees. ALEs with fewer than 100 full-time employees will be subject to the employer mandate starting in 2016. At all times, employers with fewer than 50 full-time employees are exempt from the employer mandate and Code Sec. 6056 reporting.
Reporting
The IRS has issued regulations describing how ALEs will report health insurance coverage. The IRS has not yet issued any of the forms that ALEs will use but has advised that ALEs generally will report the requisite information to the agency electronically.
ALEs also must provide statements to employees. The statements will describe, among other things, the coverage provided to the employee.
30-Hour Threshold
A fundamental question for the employer mandate and Code Sec. 6056 reporting is who is a full-time employee. Since passage of the Affordable Care Act, the IRS and other federal agencies have issued much guidance to answer this question. The answer is extremely technical and there are many exceptions but generally a full-time employee means, with respect to any month, an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week. The IRS has designed two methods for determining full-time employee status: the monthly measurement method and the look-back measurement method. However, special rules apply to seasonal workers, student employees, volunteers, individuals who work on-call, and many more. If you have any questions about who is a full-time employee, please contact our office.
Form W-2 reporting
The Affordable Care Act also requires employers to disclose the aggregate cost of employer-provided health coverage on an employee's Form W-2. This requirement is separate from the employer mandate and Code Sec. 6056 reporting. The reporting of health insurance costs on Form W-2 is for informational purposes only. It does not affect an employee's tax liability or an employer's liability for the employer mandate.
Shortly after the Affordable Care Act was passed, the IRS provided transition relief to small employers that remains in effect today. An employer is not subject the reporting requirement for any calendar year if the employer was required to file fewer than 250 Forms W-2 for the preceding calendar year. Special rules apply to multiemployer plans, health reimbursement arrangements, and many more.
Please contact our office if you have any questions about ALEs, the employer mandate or Code Sec. 6056 reporting.
The IRS's final "repair" regulations became effective January 1, 2014. The regulations provide a massive revision to the rules on capitalizing and deducting costs incurred with respect to tangible property. The regulations apply to amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property; every business is affected, especially those with significant fixed assets.
The IRS's final "repair" regulations became effective January 1, 2014. The regulations provide a massive revision to the rules on capitalizing and deducting costs incurred with respect to tangible property. The regulations apply to amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property; every business is affected, especially those with significant fixed assets.
Required and elective changes
There is a lot of work ahead for most taxpayers to comply with the new rules. There are three categories of changes under the regulations:
Changes that are required and are retroactive, with full adjustments under Code Sec. 481(a), in effect applying the regulations to previous years;
Required changes with modified or prospective Code Sec. 481(a) adjustment beginning in 2014; and
Elective changes that do not require any adjustments under Code Sec. 481.
Required changes with full adjustments include unit of property changes, deducting repairs (including the routine maintenance safe harbor), deducting dealer expenses that facilitate the sale of property, the optional method for rotable spare parts, capitalizing improvements and capitalizing certain acquisition or production costs. Elective changes can include capitalizing repair and maintenance costs of they are capitalized for financial accounting purposes.
Rev. Proc. 2014-16
The IRS issued Rev. Proc. 2014-16, granting automatic consent to taxpayers to change their accounting methods to comply with the final regulations. Rev. Proc. 2014-16 applies to all the significant provisions in the final regulations, such as repairs and improvements; materials and supplies, including rotable and temporary spare parts; and costs that have to be capitalized as improvements. Rev. Proc. 2014-16 supersedes Rev. Proc. 2012-19, which applied to changes made under the temporary and proposed repair regulations issued at the end of 2011.
There are 14 automatic method changes provided by Rev. Proc. 2014-16 for the repair regulations. Taxpayers may file for automatic consent on a single Form 3115, even if they are making changes in more than area. The normal scope limitations on changing accounting methods do not apply to a taxpayer making one or more changes for any tax year beginning before January 1, 2015. Scope changes would normally apply if the taxpayer is under examination, is in the final year of a trade or business, or is changing the same accounting method it changed in the previous five years.
Filing deadlines
For past years, taxpayers can apply the 2011 proposed and temporary (TD 9564) regulations or the 2013 final regulations to either 2012 or 2013, and can do this on a section-by-section basis. Taxpayers that decide to apply the final or temporary regulations to 2013 must file for an automatic change of accounting method (Form 3115) by September 15, 2014. Taxpayers applying the regulations to 2014 must file for an automatic change by September 15, 2015. (Both dates apply to calendar-year taxpayers.) The government has indicated it is unlikely to postpone the effective date of the regulations.
Dispositions
Rev. Proc. 2014-16 does not apply to dispositions of tangible property. The government issued reproposed regulations in this area (NPRM REG-110732-13). Although these regulations may not be finalized until later in 2014, the IRS expects to issue Rev. Proc. 2014-17 before then to allow taxpayers to make automatic accounting method changes under the proposed regulations. The procedure will provide some relief by allowing taxpayers to revoke general asset account elections that they made under the temporary regulations. No comments were submitted on these proposed regulations; it is likely the final regulations will not have any significant changes.